Critical thinking is
a crucial skill for people to have in society. More importantly, many people's
severe lack of critical thinking skills is a crippling problem facing our
society. To understand why this is a problem, one must first understand
what the term “critical thinking” entails. According to Daniel T. Willingham,
Psychologist at the University of Virginia, critical thinking consists "of
seeing both sides of an issue, being open to new evidence that disconfirms
young ideas, reasoning dispassionately, demanding that claims be backed by
evidence, deducing and inferring conclusions from available facts, solving
problems, and so forth." Essentially, critical thinking requires taking
the time to understand and reason through all sides of an issue, rather than
just one single perspective. To think critically means to be able to think open
mindedly and empathize with other people - to not only understand one's own
perspectives, assumptions, and biases, but the same for other people. Many
people of all ages and backgrounds simply cannot do this. They form an opinion
or belief and adamantly refuse to consider an opposing idea or perspective.
Most people who feel strongly about a topic or issue cannot even begin to
explain the reasons why other people have opposing opinions. When asked the
simple question of why other people have opposing views, few can give a well
thought-out or valid answer. Some are arrogant and assume that those who
disagree are wrong or stupid, and others are lazy and will admit to not knowing
why someone disagrees, but few are capable of thinking critically and making an
earnest effort at understanding all sides of an issue. And when that is the
case, compromise and progress are almost impossible. Therefore, for the benefit
of all members of society as a whole, kindergarten through twelfth grade
education curriculum needs to be changed to promote critical thinking, rather
than prevent it. Our children need to be taught to think critically.
The problem with the
modern education system as it relates to critical thinking skills is that not
only are students not taught any of these skills, but in fact, the entire
education system works to obstruct critical thinking. As stated by bell hooks
in Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom, "Most children are taught
early on that thinking is dangerous... whether in homes with parents who teach
via a model of discipline and punishment or in schools where independent thinking
is not [an] acceptable behavior... children stop enjoying the process of
thinking and start fearing the thinking mind." This starts early in one's
educational experience and does not ever end during kindergarten through
twelfth grade schooling. The film Chalk demonstrates this very well. In Chalk
the viewer experiences exaggerated examples of many problems facing the high
school education curriculum today. In particular, a history class taught by a
teacher by the name of Mr. Lowrey does an exceptional job at displaying the way
schools actively work to obstruct the development of critical thinking
abilities. His method of teaching is one that many students are unfortunately
familiar with, revolving around the memorization and recitation of information
without thought or analysis. In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paolo Freire refers
to this as the "Banking" concept of education. He asserts that
"Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are
the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communication,
the teacher issues communiqués and makes deposits which the students patiently
receive, memorize, and repeat." This style of teaching is not at all
uncommon today. High school classes where questioning an instructor is even
welcome are rare; classes where thinking critically and questioning what is
being taught are encouraged are almost nonexistent.
Therefore, changing the system to promote the development of critical thinking
skills is not a simple task. Quite the opposite - creating a "critical
thinking" class changes nothing - what is required is a significant
reformation of curriculum and the way most classes are taught. Every aspect of
the existing "banking" system of education would, optimally, be
revamped. No more classes focused on teachers who do nothing but deposit
information into students, who merely memorize and recite. In many cases, the
entire "role" that a teacher plays in the classroom would have to
change. To quote bell hooks again, she states that "So much academic
training encourages teachers to assume that they must be 'right' at all times.
Instead... teachers must be open at all times, and we must be willing to
acknowledge what we do not know. A radical commitment to openness maintains the
integrity of the critical thinking process and its central role in
education." Succeeding in this education reform would not only drastically
change the operation of classrooms and the functions of schools but would
ultimately improve society as a whole. A population of critical thinkers would
be vastly more capable of progress and compromise in social and political
disputes. Effectively solving this problem in our education system would
inadvertently work to solve many other problems facing this country.
There are some very blatant problems with the education system in this country.
Most everyone can agree with that claim - the students, the teachers, and even
people who aren't involved at all in education. Some issues facing it are so
apparent that American comedian and social critic Lewis Black jokingly states
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that our school systems are
broken—which is good, because none of us are!" Despite this, there are
those who might disagree with the entire premise that lacking critical thinking
skills is a problem. Even acknowledging that there are many problems with the
education system, these people would say that critical thinking isn't one of
them, that it has no place in the classroom. These people would say this is the
way our country or society has always been, and doesn't need to change; they
would maintain that it isn't a problem. It is a very ironic counterargument,
because while they cling on to tradition and dismiss the problem, they're
blatantly showing themselves to be lacking the critical thinking skills that
they're arguing against. There is truly no downside to possessing critical
thinking skills, and to say that there is a reason not to promote critical
thinking in schools is on par with being opposed to improving literacy
rates.
As our country progresses into ever increasing populations and pressured
economic power, the importance of critical thinking skills will be more and
more imperative. It will be very difficult to deal with the social, political
and economic problems that our country will be facing in the future while also
maintaining an education curriculum which actively works to obstruct and
prevent the development of critical thinking skills in students. The
"banking" system of education described by Paolo Freire an entire
forty three years ago has not changed at all, and continuing to accept it as a
viable and effective method of teaching is harmful to all of the students who
go through it and society as a whole. Therefore, for the benefit of all
students and for the benefit of every aspect of our country, it is vitally
important for the education system, kindergarten through twelfth grade
education curriculum to be reformed to incorporate the development and
promotion of critical thinking skills in students.
Works Cited
hooks, bell. Teaching
Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis, 2009. Print.
Freire, Paolo.
"The Banking Concept of Education." Pedagogy of the
Oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder, 1970. Print.
Willingham, Daniel T.
“Critical Thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?” gmu.edu.
George Mason University, July 2007.
Web. 3 December 2013.
Chalk. Dir. Mike Akel. Troy
Schremmer. SomeDaySoon Productions, 2006. DVD.
Daily Show: Back in Black: Education Crisis.Dir. Lizz Winstead, Madeleine Smithberg. Perf. Jon Stewart,
Lewis Black. Mad Cow Productions, Comedy Central, 2010. Web. 21 November 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment